";s:4:"text";s:5685:"It’s lighter and smaller than the 14mm f/2.4 SP, but it also feels very well-made (despite the plastic parts). It feels ready to stand the test of time along with any Canon, Nikon, or maybe even a Zeiss lens. However, in case you haven’t been reading online reviews as avidly as I have, it is no secret that Rokinon … I will be taking photos of my hometown with the two lenses and will compare the experience of using o… This is a comparison of all three Rokinon 14mm lenses (also branded as Samyang) is by landscape and astro photographer Matthew Saville.. Despite the fact that it's one of the older options, it still has a lot of fight left in it until an M2 version is eventually released. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. (On Canon 6D), In the extreme corner, the new Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF is a bit sharper than the older lens. Whenever I’m using any ultra-wide lens, I always find myself holding out my hand to flag the sun from hitting the front element. It’s the oldest, the lightest, and by far the cheapest at just $350, or $250 when it goes on sale. Irix 15mm f/2.4 Firefly & Blackstone: If you’re willing to go with a slightly less wide focal length, Irix has an interesting offer: Two versions of the same lens. The AF 14mm has seven aperture blades, giving 14-point starbursts. The Rokinon (Samyang) 20mm f/1.8 ED AS UMC Wide Angle Lens The Rokinon 20mm f/1.8 is usually priced at about $550-600, but every now and then it does go on sale for up to $200 off, depending on which mount you’re purchasing. At $399.99, this is one of the cheaper e-mount full frame lenses you… Nikon Df / Canon 6D, Rokinon 24mm f/1.4 (Clip from a “drivelapse” timelapse, click here to view on Youtube)Rokinon / Bower / Samyang Construction Quality. We’ll get to the breakdown next. Read more Sony A7 vs A7 II vs A7 III Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC, Canon Mount | This is approximately where to set focus for nightscape photography. Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC: Now, here is a great lens at a great price. Rokinon Lenses. Unfortunately there is quite a lot of confusion around this particular lens, there are several different variations on the same, or very similar design. Both of the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8’s make great travel ultra-wide lenses. (In case you’re wondering, all three of these 14mm lenses utterly destroy the Canon 14mm f/2.8 L II in terms of sharpness, especially towards the edges/corners.). (Spoiler: it’s bigger, it’s pricier, and yes, it’s better! All three of these 14mm lenses are impressively sharp, even wide open at f/2.8, from the center to past the rule-of-thirds area. So if you’re not shooting something like action sports or weddings, you’ll probably be just fine with a manual focus lens, using magnified live view to focus. Now on to the pictures. With the success of these lenses combined with the Cine-Mod, Samyang and Rokinon took notice. Some people don’t mind them, but personally, I’m not a fan of any filter larger or more complicated than an 82mm screw-in filter. So, let’s commence the comparison of the Irix 15mm and the Rokinon (Samyang) 14mm. And it's little wonder since this is a great lens. Unfortunately, none of the lenses have any hyperfocal markings, for those of you who still use them. And the next step up is considerably more expensive. I have read somewhere that originally the difference between the two brands was essentially the AF vs. MF. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | 30 sec at f/11 ISO 100. I don't intend to use this lens too much so I have no intention of spending the same as I would on a good refractor for this. For example, right now (November 2018) you can get this lens for between $400 and … I think they are the same but I have always bought the Rokinon versions and have had good copies on all of them. You might notice a faint color difference when using any of these three lenses. Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 vs. Samyang/Rokinon 75mm f/1.4 Sony's own 85mm f/1.8 lens has been the comparison block to new entries within the 85 focal length. Autofocus on an ultrawide lens isn’t very necessary, though, for many types of photography. If you’re willing to carry a heavier lens that stops at 15mm instead of 14mm, this is a great choice. The decision is all about your priorities as a photographer, and it should already be clear: if you rarely even use 14mm, and just want to “cover the bases”, then get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC. (On Canon 6D). Still, for the purposes of this comparison, we have to draw the line somewhere. Still, that’s a fair trade-off for the sharpness they offer for the price. The autofocus models are of course more expensive for that same focal length. The Rokinon AF 14mm f/2.8 has autofocus, and despite Rokinon still being relatively new to the realm of autofocus lenses, it works very well. 14mm is something of a specialty focal length. If you hate seeing “wings” on your stars in the corners of your nightscape images, get any of these lenses. Let’s get right to it! Samyang also make lenses which are branded in various names you may have heard such as Vivitar and Opteka and others. Tilt-shift lenses are, by nature, manual focus only, and Samyang/Rokinon have made their reputation by making manual focus only lenses with good build quality and great optics. Only the AF 14mm f/2.8 has a rubber mount gasket. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. The Rokinon 12mm f/2 NCS CS is a fairly inexpensive ultra-wide-angle lens for crop-sensor cameras, such as Fujifilm X. ";s:7:"keyword";s:18:"samyang vs rokinon";s:5:"links";s:1675:"Coursera Architecture & Design,
Html Ui Kit,
Leaf Icon App,
Difficulties In Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form Pdf,
Automotive Design Programs Ontario Universities,
N4 Civil Engineering Salary,
Chop Chop Edinburgh Vegan,
Behringer U-phoria Um2 Setup Mac,
God Of War Sigrun Helmet,
Mercedes Rental Dallas,
Stair Step Scribe,
";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}